![]() In response, the carrier raised a question of fraud and the case was reopened. Claimant thereafter completed two State Insurance Fund questionnaires, one in July 1997 and the other in January 1998, wherein he indicated, among other things, that he had not worked in any capacity since his injury and that his physical activities consisted of taking walks when able to do so. Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed October 13, 2004, which ruled that claimant violated Workers' Compensation Law § 114-a and disqualified him from receiving wage replacement benefits.Ĭlaimant sustained work-related injuries in January 1994 and subsequently was classified with a marked permanent partial disability and awarded benefits. ![]() Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.Ĭrew III, J. ![]() In the Matter of the Claim of Ronald Bottieri, Appellant, v New York State Department of Taxation and Finance et al., Respondents. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.Īs corrected through Wednesday, May 17, 2006 Matter of Bottieri v New York State Dept.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |